ReviewBiomedicines2025
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Clinical Presentation, Sequelae and Neuroimaging Features-An Update.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy Presenting as Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Cognitive Decline in an 80-Year-Old Patient: A Clinicoradiologic Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- A DERIVED RELAXATION CONTRAST FROM SYNTHETIC MRI FOR DETECTING NETWORK MICROSTRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- [New treatments for Alzheimer disease : A challenge for radiology].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Imaging and fluid biomarkers for prognostic stratification in cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Pharmacogenetics or predictive genetics? APOE testing blurs the lines.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic association of ante-mortem biomarkers with cerebral amyloid angiopathy in a cohort with high Alzheimer's disease comorbidity.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) has been shown to increase with age, with rates reported to be around 50-60% in individuals over 80 years old who have cognitive impairment. The disease often presents as spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), which carries a high risk of recurrence, along with transient focal neurologic episodes (TFNE) and progressive cognitive decline, potentially leading to Alzheimer's disease (AD). In addition to ICH, neuroradiologic findings of CAA include cortical and subcortical microbleeds (MB), cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) and cortical superficial siderosis (cSS). Non-hemorrhagic pathologies include dilated perivascular spaces in the centrum semiovale and multiple hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A definitive diagnosis of CAA still requires histological confirmation. The Boston criteria allow for the diagnosis of a probable or possible CAA by considering specific neurological and MRI findings. The recent version, 2.0, which includes additional non-hemorrhagic MRI findings, increases sensitivity while maintaining the same specificity. The characteristic MRI findings of autoantibody-related CAA-related inflammation (CAA-ri) are similar to the so-called "amyloid related imaging abnormalities" (ARIA) observed with amyloid antibody therapies, presenting in two variants: (a) vasogenic edema and leptomeningeal effusions (ARIA-E) and (b) hemorrhagic lesions (ARIA-H). Clinical and MRI findings enable the diagnosis of a probable or possible CAA-ri, with biopsy remaining the gold standard for confirmation. In contrast to spontaneous CAA-ri, only about 20% of patients treated with monoclonal antibodies who show proven ARIA on MRI also experience clinical symptoms, including headache, confusion, other psychopathological abnormalities, visual disturbances, nausea and vomiting. Recent findings indicate that treatment should be continued in cases of mild ARIA, with ongoing MRI and clinical monitoring. This review offers a concise update on CAA and its associated consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.