Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150315›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Comparison Between Two Methodologies of Sample Preservation for RNA Extraction in Naturally Delivered Ovine Placenta.

Florencia Aránguiz, Javiera Bahamonde, Francisco Sales, Matías Araya, César Ulloa-Leal, Marcelo Ratto, Camila Sandoval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florencia AránguizFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Javiera BahamondeFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-4987-5740
Francisco SalesInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Centro Regional de Investigación INIA Kampenaike, Punta Arenas 6200000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9197-8658
Matías ArayaFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
César Ulloa-LealEscuela de Ciencias Agrícolas y Veterinarias, Universidad Viña del Mar, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile.ORCID 0009-0005-7750-0382
Marcelo RattoFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6072-7469
Camila SandovalInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Centro Regional de Investigación INIA Kampenaike, Punta Arenas 6200000, Chile.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo FONDECYT INICIACION 11220188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placental samples for RNA extraction are collected via non-recovery (euthanasia) or invasive (surgery) methods in small ruminants, such as sheep. Alternatively, delivered placentas could be used, but the feasibility of obtaining high-quality RNA from this tissue is unknown in sheep. We aimed to evaluate the possibility of extracting RNA from naturally delivered ovine placenta, comparing two preservation methods. Twenty-seven single-pregnant sheep were monitored 24/7 from gestational day 140 to parturition. Tissue was collected after placental delivery, preserved using snap frozen (SF,

Indexed as

delivered placentaRNAsheep

Identifiers

PMID40150315
PMCPMC11939649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.