ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Leveraging Whole-Genome Resequencing to Uncover Genetic Diversity and Promote Conservation Strategies for Ruminants in Asia.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated whole-genome resequencing and mRNA-miRNA analysis reveals selection signals and regulatory networks of antipyretic effect variation in Morus alba var. multicaulis.BMC biotechnology · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide, High-Density Genotyping Approaches for Plant Germplasm Characterisation (Methods and Applications).International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Detection of Genetic Polymorphism in Growth Hormone Receptor Gene and Its Influence on Growth Traits in Kari and Balkhi Sheep.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Genetic Analysis of the Conserved Population of Dengchuan Cattle Based on High Concordance SNP loci.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole-genome resequencing (WGRS) is a critical branch of whole-genome sequencing (WGS), primarily targeting species with existing reference genomes. By aligning sequencing data to the reference genome, WGRS enables precise detection of genetic variations in individuals or populations. As a core technology in genomic research, WGS holds profound significance in ruminant studies. It not only reveals the intricate structure of ruminant genomes but also provides essential data for deciphering gene function, variation patterns, and evolutionary processes, thereby advancing the exploration of ruminant genetic mechanisms. However, WGS still faces several challenges, such as incomplete and inaccurate genome assembly, as well as the incomplete annotation of numerous unknown genes or gene functions. Although WGS can identify a vast number of genomic variations, the specific relationships between these variations and phenotypes often remain unclear, which limits its potential in functional studies and breeding applications. By performing WGRS on multiple samples, these assembly challenges can be effectively addressed, particularly in regions with high repeat content or complex structural variations. WGRS can accurately identify subtle variations among different individuals or populations and further elucidate their associations with specific traits, thereby overcoming the limitations of WGS and providing more precise genetic information for functional research and breeding applications. This review systematically summarizes the latest applications of WGRS in the analysis of ruminant genetic structures, genetic diversity, economic traits, and adaptive traits, while also discussing the challenges faced by this technology. It aims to provide a scientific foundation for the improvement and conservation of ruminant genetic resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.