ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
In Vivo Performance of a Novel Hyper-Crosslinked Carbohydrate Polymer Bone Graft Substitute for Spinal Fusion.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Critical Review of Commercial Collagen-Based Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration: Functional Properties and Clinical Evidence from InfuseJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone graft materials are essential for achieving arthrodesis after spine surgery. Safe bone graft products, with osteoinductive, osteoconductive properties and the ability to monitor fusion in real-time, are highly desirable. A novel hyper-crosslinked carbohydrate polymer (HCCP) bone graft substitute was shown to aid in bone regeneration in critical-size defect studies in a rabbit model. These studies further evaluated the in vivo application of HCCP as a bone graft substitute in an ovine model of spinal fusion and a retrospective study in adult human spine surgery patients. Sheep studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of HCCP with no evidence of adverse histopathology over 6 months of follow-up. In human studies, patients (N = 63) underwent posterolateral fusion with HCCP, with follow-up to assess fusion success. No adverse reaction related to the HCCP bone graft substitute was identified. Fusion success was noted to be non-inferior to other bone graft substitutes. HCCP appears to be a safe bone void filler adjunct for use in spinal fusion surgery for both trauma and degenerative disease. It has a good degradation profile for forming bone with the ability to provide new vasculature and may also function as a scaffold to carry cells, medications, and growth factors. Given the safety profile experienced in our preclinical and clinical studies, future investigation into its efficacy to achieve solid fusion is currently ongoing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.