Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40150788›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Transformation Experiment of Frederick Griffith I: Its Narrowing and Potential for the Creation of Novel Microorganisms.

Günter A Müller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Günter A MüllerBiology and Technology Studies Institute Munich (BITSIM), 80939 Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construction of artificial microorganisms often relies on the transfer of genomes from donor to acceptor cells. This synthetic biology approach has been considerably fostered by the J. Craig Venter Institute but apparently depends on the use of microorganisms, which are very closely related. One reason for this limitation of the "creative potential" of "classical" transformation is the requirement for adequate "fitting" of newly synthesized polypeptide components, directed by the donor genome, to interacting counterparts encoded by the pre-existing acceptor genome. Transformation was introduced in 1928 by Frederick Griffith in the course of the demonstration of the instability of pneumococci and their conversion from rough, non-pathogenic into smooth, virulent variants. Subsequently, this method turned out to be critical for the identification of DNA as the sole matter of inheritance. Importantly, the initial experimental design (1.0) also considered the inheritance of both structural (e.g., plasma membranes) and cybernetic information (e.g., metabolite fluxes), which, in cooperation, determine topological and cellular heredity, as well as fusion and blending of bacterial cells. In contrast, subsequent experimental designs (1.X) were focused on the use of whole-cell homogenates and, thereafter, of soluble and water-clear fractions deprived of all information and macromolecules other than those directing protein synthesis, including outer-membrane vesicles, bacterial prions, lipopolysaccharides, lipoproteins, cytoskeletal elements, and complexes thereof. Identification of the reasons for this narrowing may be helpful in understanding the potential of transformation for the creation of novel microorganisms.

Indexed as

cellular heredityhorizontal gene transferscience and technology studiesscientific reductionismsynthetic biologytransforming principle

Identifiers

PMID40150788
PMCPMC11939280

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.