ArticleIET systems biology
Investigating the Impact of Antibiotics on Environmental Microbiota Through Machine Learning Models.
Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic pollution in the environment can significantly impact soil microorganisms, such as altering the soil microbial community or emerging antibiotic-resistant bacteria. We propose three machine learning (ML) methods to investigate antibiotics' impact on microorganisms and predict microbial abundance. We examined the microbial abundances of various environmental soil samples treated with antibiotics. We developed 3 ML models: (Model 1) for predicting the most abundant bacterial classes in a specific treatment group; (Model 2) for predicting antibiotic treatment effects based on bacterial abundances; and (Model 3) for using data from short-term incubations to predict the data of community structure after stabilisation. In Model 1, the Random Forest model achieved the highest average accuracy, with a Coefficient of Variation mean of 0.05 and 0.14 in the training and test set. In Model 2, the accuracy of the random forest and SVM models have the highest accuracy (nearly 0.90). Model 3 demonstrates that the Random Forest can use data from short-term incubations to predict the abundance of bacterial communities after long-term stabilisation. This study highlights the potential of ML models as powerful tools for understanding microbial dynamics in response to antibiotic treatments. The code is publicly available at - https://github.com/DeweyYihengDu/ML_on_Microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.