ArticleTuberculosis and respiratory diseases2025
Maximal Forced Inspiratory Flow Dynamics and Acute Exacerbation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients with Exacerbation History.
Article in Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), characterized by progressive airflow obstruction and frequent exacerbations, is a significant global health burden. COPD severity has traditionally been assessed using expiratory flow measurements, like forced expiratory volume in 1 second. However, the role of inspiratory flow, specifically maximal forced inspiratory flow (FIFmax), in predicting exacerbation risk is gaining attention.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study evaluated COPD patients with a history of exacerbations who were receiving inhaled therapy. The eligible patients were followed up for 3 years with spirometric assessments. Patients were categorized into quartiles based on the annual change in FIFmax, from the greatest decrease (Q1) to the greatest increase (Q4). Primary outcome was acute exacerbation, stratified by severity as moderate-to-severe and severe exacerbation.
resultsIn total, 180 patients were followed up for 3 years. A greater increase in FIFmax was linearly associated with lower rates of both moderate-to-severe and severe exacerbations (p-value for trend <0.001 for both), but time-to-event analysis revealed no significant association between FIFmax changes and moderate-to-severe exacerbations. In contrast, a significant association with severe exacerbations was observed (log-rank p=0.005). Even after adjusting for confounders, FIFmax remained an independent predictor of severe exacerbations (Q3: hazard ratio, 0.506 [95% confidence interval, 0.306 to 0.836], p=0.008; Q4: hazard ratio, 0.491 [95% confidence interval, 0.291 to 0.830], p=0.008).
conclusionChanges in FIFmax were not significantly associated with moderate-to-severe exacerbations, but were related to a reduced risk of severe exacerbations in COPD patients receiving inhaled therapy. These findings indicate that FIFmax may serve as a valuable prognostic marker for severe exacerbations in high-risk COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.