Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40152137›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

DiMB-RE: mining the scientific literature for diet-microbiome associations.

Gibong Hong, Veronica Hindle, Nadine M Veasley, Hannah D Holscher, Halil Kilicoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Harnessing the power of large language models for clinical tasks and synthesis of scientific literature.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gibong HongSchool of Information Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, United States.
Veronica HindleDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Nadine M VeasleyDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Hannah D HolscherDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
Halil KilicogluSchool of Information Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-9393

Funding

COMBINI: connecting COmplementary Medicine evidence and BIological kNowledge to support Integrative HealthU01AT012871 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Halil Kilicoglu, Cui Tao · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & SupportBridges-2 and Ocean at Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center #CIS230099DB NIH HHS U01AT012871National Science Foundation #2137603National Science Foundation #2138259National Science Foundation #2138286National Science Foundation #2138296National Science Foundation #2138307NCCIH NIH HHS U01 AT012871NIH HHSUniversity of Illinois Personalized Nutrition InitiativeUniversity of Illinois Personalized Nutrition Initiative Seed
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a corpus annotated for diet-microbiome associations from the biomedical literature and train natural language processing (NLP) models to identify these associations, thereby improving the understanding of their role in health and disease, and supporting personalized nutrition strategies. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe constructed DiMB-RE, a comprehensive corpus annotated with 15 entity types (eg, Nutrient, Microorganism) and 13 relation types (eg, increases, improves) capturing diet-microbiome associations. We fine-tuned and evaluated state-of-the-art NLP models for named entity, trigger, and relation extraction as well as factuality detection using DiMB-RE. In addition, we benchmarked 2 generative large language models (GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o) on a subset of the dataset in zero- and one-shot settings.

resultsDiMB-RE consists of 14 450 entities and 4206 relationships from 165 publications (including 30 full-text Results sections). Fine-tuned NLP models performed reasonably well for named entity recognition (0.800 F1 score), while end-to-end relation extraction performance was modest (0.445 F1). The use of Results section annotations improved relation extraction. The impact of trigger detection was mixed. Generative models showed lower accuracy compared to fine-tuned models. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, DiMB-RE is the largest and most diverse corpus focusing on diet-microbiome interactions. Natural language processing models fine-tuned on DiMB-RE exhibit lower performance compared to similar corpora, highlighting the complexity of information extraction in this domain. Misclassified entities, missed triggers, and cross-sentence relations are the major sources of relation extraction errors.

conclusionDiMB-RE can serve as a benchmark corpus for biomedical literature mining. DiMB-RE and the NLP models are available at https://github.com/ScienceNLP-Lab/DiMB-RE.

Indexed as

Data MiningDietMicrobiotaNatural Language ProcessingHumansbiomedical literature miningcorpus annotationdiet-microbiome associationsnamed entity recognitionrelation extraction

Identifiers

PMID40152137
PMCPMC12089768

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.