ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
MNMO: discover driver genes from a multi-omics data based-multi-layer network.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCancer as a public health problem is driven by genomic variations in "cancer driver" genes. The identification of driver genes is critical for the discovery of key biomarkers and the development of personalized therapy.
resultsWe propose a prediction method MNMO: a multi-layer network model based on multi-omics data. MNMO firstly constructs a dynamically adjusted four-layer network composed of miRNAs and three kinds of genes with different features. Then three kinds of scores, i.e. control capacity, mutation score, and network score, are devised and calculated by harmonic mean to produce the integrated gene score. Experiments were performed on three kinds of real cancer data to compare the identification performance of method MNMO with that of six state-of-the-art ones. The results indicate that method MNMO presents the best identification performance under most circumstances. The genes prioritized by method MNMO not only have a better match to the benchmark ones than those identified by the other methods, but also are all associated with the development and progression of cancers. In addition, some extended versions of method MNMO can further achieve better performance on most evaluation metrics for some specific datasets. They may be more conducive to identifying tissue-specific genes, which has been verified through a number of experiments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and the R package "MNMO" are available at https://github.com/Zheng-D/MNMO. The dataset and code are archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14969986.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.