Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40152339›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2025

Reducing Health Inequity for Children and Young People in Rural Australia: Are Digital Interventions a Panacea? A Rural Generalist's Commentary.

Corin Miller, Hayley Smithers-Sheedy, Nan Hu, David Schmidt, Annemarie Christie, Tammy Morris, Lena Sanci, Raghu Lingam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corin MillerC/o Population Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-5353-8098
Hayley Smithers-SheedyC/o Population Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Nan HuC/o Population Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
David SchmidtUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Annemarie ChristieC/o Population Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Tammy MorrisC/o Population Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Lena SanciUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Raghu LingamC/o Population Child Health Research Group, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore the role of digital interventions in improving health equity for children and young people (CYP) in rural Australia from a rural generalist's perspective. CONTEXT: Rural Australian CYP experience worse health outcomes than their urban peers and have insufficient access to early intervention and support. Rural paediatric outpatient waiting times as long as 6 years have been reported, with some regions having no services. Digital interventions have expanded since the COVID pandemic, providing new opportunities to improve quality and access to care for CYP in rural settings. APPROACH: Here we provide a synthesis of the literature and health policy, from the perspective of a clinician working in rural Australian paediatric care, to describe the role and limitations of digital interventions to support CYP in rural areas.

conclusionDigital interventions such as telephone and video consultations, online tools, child-friendly robot ward rounds, and digital GP-paediatrician co-consulting models show great promise in helping to bridge the gap in health outcomes for rural Australian CYP. Models of care that utilise digital components can provide care closer to home for rural families; however, research to evaluate the effectiveness of these models in the Australian context is lacking. Infrastructure challenges, cultural considerations, and patient preferences limit the utility of digital interventions for some populations. A panacea? Unfortunately, not; however, these technologies herald an exciting new phase in healthcare for rural Australian CYP, and digital interventions are likely to play an increasingly important role in increasing access to care for this population.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesRural Health ServicesRural PopulationAdolescentAustraliaChildCOVID-19Health EquityHealth Services AccessibilityHumansTelemedicinehealthcare accesspaediatricprimary carerural healthtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40152339
PMCPMC11951394

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.