Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40152900›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2025

Advancing lung transplantation through machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Lielle Ronen, Shaf Keshavjee, Andrew T Sage

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lielle RonenLatner Thoracic Research Laboratories, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network.
Shaf KeshavjeeLatner Thoracic Research Laboratories, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network.
Andrew T SageLatner Thoracic Research Laboratories, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo explore the current applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in lung transplantation, including outcome prediction, drug dosing, and the potential future uses and risks as the technology continues to evolve. RECENT

findingsWhile the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in lung transplantation is relatively new, several groups have developed models to predict short-term outcomes, such as primary graft dysfunction and time-to-extubation, as well as long-term outcomes related to survival and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Additionally, drug dosing models for Tacrolimus levels have been designed, demonstrating proof of concept for modelling treatment as a time-series problem. SUMMARY: The integration of ML models with clinical decision-making has shown promise in improving post-transplant survival and optimizing donor lung utilization. As technology advances, the field will continue to evolve, with enhanced datasets supporting more sophisticated ML models, particularly through real-time monitoring of biological, biochemical, and physiological data.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLung TransplantationMachine LearningClinical Decision-MakingHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsImmunosuppressive Agentsartificial intelligenceex vivo lung perfusionlung transplantationmachine learningmultimodaloutcome predictiontime-series forecasting

Identifiers

PMID40152900
PMCPMC12144528

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.