ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Implant placement-associated tissue swelling: a digital three-dimensional and patient-based assessment.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impaired healing following implant placement surgery: A case report of a modern-day manifestation of scurvy.Clinical advances in periodontics · 2026Article
- Deep-stromal implantation of a double-crosslinked bioengineered porcine collagen implant (BPCDX) in advanced keratoconus: a 12-month study of corneal remodeling and visual outcomes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThere is scarce evidence on immediate soft tissue and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following implant surgery. This prospective study aimed to quantify post-implant placement intraoral swelling and to correlate it with PROMs. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-six patients undergoing standardized single implant placement (two-stage protocol) were recruited. Soft tissue swelling was recorded by intraoral scans immediately pre-surgery (PS) and post-operatively (IP), and at 2 (2d), 7 (7d) and 14 days (14d) and 2 months (2 m). Ridge width, height, and volume changes from IP were recorded. PROMs (pain, swelling, difficulty of mouth opening, and OHIP-14) were recorded pre- and post-operatively.
resultsRidge width (1.9±0.04 mm), height (1.4 ±0.02 mm) and volume (37.8±0.8%) peaked on 2d (p < 0.0001 vs. IP for all). Width returned to IP levels by 7d (p = 0.43; 7d vs. IP), and height and volume between 14d and 2 m (p≤0.002; all time points vs. IP). Patient-reported pain, swelling and difficulty of mouth opening exhibited a similar trajectory, while OHIP-14 values improved until 2 m (p < 0.0001 vs. PS). Ridge width differences IP/2d were correlated with patient-reported swelling (ρ = 0.53-0.54) and difficulty of mouth opening (ρ = 0.43-0.45) at 2d.
conclusionFollowing implant placement, soft tissue exhibits maximal swelling at 2 days and patients experience the most significant pain, swelling and difficulty of mouth opening at the same time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The swelling timing and magnitude findings of the present study may assist clinicians when delivering and modifying temporary restorations (safety distance between restoration/tissue), as well as managing patient pain and swelling expectations following implant placement surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.