SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Parasitaemia and fever in uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microhaplotype deep sequencing assays to capture Plasmodium vivax infection lineages.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Therapeutic efficacy, safety and gametocyte clearance after antimalarial treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in Northeast Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- TLR9 gene polymorphism -1237T/C (rs5743836) is associated with low IgG antibody response against PvCSP variants in symptomatic P. vivax infections in Venezuela.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParasite density thresholds used for diagnosing symptomatic malaria are defined by the relationship between parasitaemia and fever. This relationship can inform the design and development of novel diagnostic tests but appropriate parasitaemia thresholds for Plasmodium vivax malaria remain poorly defined. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe undertook an individual patient data meta-analysis of P. vivax clinical trials mapped to the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) repository and used parasitaemia centiles of febrile patients at enrolment to derive proportions of patients who would have been diagnosed at different parasite densities. Febrile and afebrile patients with recurrent infections were selected to estimate pyrogenic densities using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In total 13,263 patients from 50 studies were included in the analysis. In 27 studies (8,378 febrile patients) in which a parasitaemia threshold was not applied as an inclusion criterion, the median parasitaemia at enrolment was 3,280/µL (interquartile range, 968 - 8,320); 90% of patients had a parasitaemia above 278/µL (10th centile), and 95% above 120/µL (5th centile). The 10th centile was higher in children <5 years old (368/µL) compared to adults ≥15 years (240/µL). In high relapse periodicity regions (Southeast Asia and Oceania) febrile patients presented with lower parasitaemias (10th centile 185/µL vs. 504/µL) and a wider range of parasitaemias compared to those from low relapse periodicity regions (interquartile range 760/µL - 8,774/µL vs. 1,204/µL - 8,000/µL). In total 2,270 patients from 41 studies had at least one episode of recurrent P. vivax parasitaemia, of whom 43% (849/1,983) were febrile at their first recurrence. The P. vivax pyrogenic density at first recurrence was 1,063/µL, defining fever with 74% sensitivity and 65% specificity. The pyrogenic density was lower in young children compared to adults ≥15 years (935/µL vs. 1,179/µL). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The derived parasitaemia centiles will inform the use of current and the design of novel point-of-care tests to diagnose patients with symptomatic vivax malaria. Variation by age and location should be considered when selecting diagnostic thresholds and interpreting results.
trial registrationThis trial was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42021254905. The date of the first registration was 17th May 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.