Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155203›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

Statistical analysis of correlated expression data from high throughput experiments.

Peng Wang, Pengfei Lyu, Shyamal Peddada, Hongyuan Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peng WangSchool of Mathematics, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, China.ORCID 0009-0002-3369-4048
Pengfei LyuDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6826-8191
Shyamal PeddadaBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Durham, NC 27709, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5014-6513
Hongyuan CaoSchool of Mathematics, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-732X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 12171483NIEHSZIA ES103389-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data obtained from high throughput experiments often exhibit complex dependencies among features. These dependencies arise from various sources, including genetic correlation, batch effects, technical replicates, and shared biological pathways. Ignoring these dependencies can lead to inflated false discovery rate (FDR), reduced statistical power, and biased biological interpretations. Properly accounting for these dependencies is crucial for accurate detection of biological signals. We propose a new method called Analysis of Correlated Expressions (ACE) to compare the mean expression of features between two groups. ACE is based on a factor analytic model that accounts for dependence among features and also incorporates heterogeneity of variances between groups, a common feature of high throughput data. Furthermore, ACE does not require the data to be normally distributed. It is scalable and free of any unknown tuning parameters. Extensive simulation studies indicate that it is more powerful than many existing methods while controlling the FDR. Application of ACE to a microRNA dataset, a neuroblastoma gene expression dataset, and a Huntington's disease dataset resulted in some novel findings that were missed by existing methods.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansHuntington DiseaseMicroRNAsNeuroblastomaMicroRNAsdependencefactor modelfalse discovery rategene expressionhigh throughput experimentmultiple testing

Identifiers

PMID40155203
PMCPMC12774819

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.