ArticleScientific reports2025
Topology-preserving contourwise shape fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The preservation of morphological features, such as protrusions and concavities, and of the topology of input shapes is important when establishing reference data for benchmarking segmentation algorithms or when constructing a mean or median shape. We present a contourwise topology-preserving fusion method, called shape-aware topology-preserving means (SATM), for merging complex simply connected shapes. The method is based on key point matching and piecewise contour averaging. Unlike existing pixelwise and contourwise fusion methods, SATM preserves topology and does not smooth morphological features. We also present a detailed comparison of SATM with state-of-the-art fusion techniques for the purpose of benchmarking and median shape construction. Our experiments show that SATM outperforms these techniques in terms of shape-related measures that reflect shape complexity, manifesting itself as a reliable method for both establishing a consensus of segmentation annotations and for computing mean shapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.