Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155604›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Cell-cycle dependent DNA repair and replication unifies patterns of chromosome instability.

Bingxin Lu, Samuel Winnall, William Cross, Chris P Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bingxin LuDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK. b.lu@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-5150
Samuel WinnallDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6847-4670
William CrossDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK.
Chris P BarnesDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK. christopher.barnes@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9459-1395

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 209409/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is pervasive in human tumours and often leads to structural or numerical chromosomal aberrations. Somatic structural variants (SVs) are intimately related to copy number alterations but the two types of variant are often studied independently. Additionally, despite numerous studies on detecting various SV patterns, there are still no general quantitative models of SV generation. To address this issue, we develop a computational cell-cycle model for the generation of SVs from end-joining repair and replication after double-strand break formation. Our model provides quantitative information on the relationship between breakage fusion bridge cycle, chromothripsis, seismic amplification, and extra-chromosomal circular DNA. Given whole-genome sequencing data, the model also allows us to infer important parameters in SV generation with Bayesian inference. Our quantitative framework unifies disparate genomic patterns resulted from CIN, provides a null mutational model for SV, and reveals deeper insights into the impact of genome rearrangement on tumour evolution.

Indexed as

Cell CycleChromosomal InstabilityDNA RepairDNA ReplicationBayes TheoremChromothripsisDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Copy Number VariationsHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40155604
PMCPMC11953314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.