ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
The predictive values of sarcopenia screening tools in preoperative elderly patients with colorectal cancer: applying the diagnostic criteria of EWGSOP2 and AWGS2019.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic inflammatory indices SIRI, AISI, and PWR are associated with sarcopenic obesity in middle-aged and older chinese adults: a cross-sectional study.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Four Screening Tools for Detecting Low Muscle Mass and Sarcopenia in Preoperative Older Japanese Patients with Colorectal Cancer According to the AWGS 2019 Criteria.Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2026Article
- Cold, Hot, and Lethal-The Tumour Microenvironment and the Immunology of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenia predicts worse postoperative outcomes and lower survival rates in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). There is a scarcity of studies on the most effective assessment tools for detecting sarcopenia in preoperative elderly patients with CRC. Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of various tools such as calf circumference (CC), strength, need for assistance with walking, rising from a sitting position, climbing stairs, and the incidence of falls (SARC-F), SARC-F plus CC (SARC-CalF), the short version of mini sarcopenia risk assessment (MSRA-5), the full version of mini sarcopenia risk assessment (MSRA-7), and Ishii score chart in screening sarcopenia in preoperative elderly patients with CRC.
methodsDuring the period of April 2021 to September 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional study involving consecutive elderly patients who were undergoing colorectal surgery. Sarcopenia was defined using the diagnostic criteria proposed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) and the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS2019). The screening tools' performances were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the ROC curves (AUC), and sensitivity/specificity analyses, based on the criteria proposed by EWGSOP2 and AWGS2019.
resultsWe enrolled 482 patients with an average age of 71.86 ± 5.60 years. According to the EWGSOP2 and AWGS2019 diagnostic standards, the incidence of sarcopenia was 19.5% and 21.6% respectively. The sensitivity of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, MSRA-5, MSRA-7, and Ishii score chart ranged from 51.92 to 56.38%, 84.62-85.11%, 86.54-88.30%, 65.96-67.31%, and 73.08-74.47% respectively, while the specificity ranged from 84.92 to 85.05%, 70.36-71.69%, 36.86-37.04%, 60.57-61.64%, and 77.32-78.31% respectively. Regardless of the sarcopenia diagnostic criteria used, the AUCs of Ishii score chart (0.87 to 0.88) and SARC-CalF (0.89 to 0.90) were significantly larger than those of other tools (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in AUCs among SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii score chart in females.
conclusionAmong the five sarcopenia screening tools, Ishii score chart and SARC-CalF had the largest overall diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenia in preoperative elderly patients with CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.