SynthesisBMC pediatrics2025
Pulmonary function testing in pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients to monitor for Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory profile of pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation studied by oscillometry - A TRANSPIRE cohort.Pediatric investigation · 2026Article
- Summary for Clinicians: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Detection of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome after Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) represents a significant source of morbidity and non-relapse mortality among children and young adults treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). Pulmonary function testing (PFT) pre- and post-aHSCT may allow for pre-symptomatic detection of BOS, and thus early intervention. Current guidelines and practices vary regarding which tests to perform and timing relative to transplant. A systematic review evaluating PFT before and after pediatric aHSCT was conducted to inform American Thoracic Society clinical practice guidelines on detection of BOS.
objectiveTo determine the optimal approach to conducting PFT prior to and after pediatric aHSCT. STUDY
designWe performed a systematic review of the literature to identify studies of PFT in human aHSCT recipients < 25 years of age to address two questions: (1) Should pre-transplant screening PFT be performed in pediatric patients who will undergo aHSCT? (2) At what frequency should pediatric patients who have had aHSCT undergo PFT? We searched in Medline through August 2022 for studies that enrolled patients < 25 years of age being treated with aHSCT for whom PFT data were reported before or after transplant.
resultsThe 30 studies with pre-transplant PFT data showed a wide range of findings, with the majority demonstrating abnormalities. In studies reporting respiratory symptoms, 85-100% of patients were asymptomatic. In the 21 studies reporting post-transplant PFT, 11 used a surveillance strategy where at least one test was performed in the first year post-transplant. Median time to BOS diagnosis was 6-12 months in the regular surveillance studies, and 6-24 months in the others. Forced expiratory volume in one second at the time of BOS diagnosis was 38-84% predicted in studies with regular surveillance versus 44-57% predicted in studies with no surveillance. In the surveillance group, BOS was identified in some patients who were asymptomatic. Data quality in studies reviewed was moderate to very low.
conclusionsAbnormalities in PFT are common in children prior to aHSCT. Regular monitoring in the first 1-2 years post-aHSCT may improve early and/or pre-symptomatic identification of BOS, but significant limitations may still be seen at the time of diagnosis. Higher quality data are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.