Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155947›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2025

Critical thinking and clinical skills by problem-based learning educational methods: an umbrella systematic review.

Wei-Li Ge, Xia-Yin Zhu, Jiang-Bo Lin, Jian-Jun Jiang, Tao Li, Yi-Fei Lu, Ya-Fei Mi, Tao-Hsin Tung

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Problem-Based Learning: A Case of Acral Melanoma.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Just-in-Time Teaching as a Learning Tool for First MBBS Students in Biochemistry.International journal of applied & basic medical research
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei-Li Ge *Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Shandong, China.
Xia-Yin Zhu *Department of Hematology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, 317000, China.
Jiang-Bo Lin *Department of Cardiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Jian-Jun JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Tao LiDepartment of Cardiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Yi-Fei LuDepartment of Cardiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China.
Ya-Fei MiDepartment of Cardiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China. Miyf@enzemed.com.
Tao-Hsin TungEvidence-Based Medicine Center, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China. ch2876@yeah.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProblem-based learning (PBL), based on self-directed learning, is an instructional strategy that shifts the approach from the instructor to the student (student-centered). Notwithstanding its adoption in undergraduate and graduate medical education, its usefulness remains a topic of debate. This study aims to review current worldwide data on the efficacy and utility of critical thinking and clinical skills using PBL educational methods for teaching programs to undergraduate medical students, ursing students, dental students and medical residents.

methodsThe search was conducted in June 2024 in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science and included all publications regardless of the publication date, study design, or country of origin.

resultsThirteen meta-analyses and systematic reviews were compiled through database screening. The results showed that PBL effectively enhanced students' clinical skills and critical thinking abilities; nevertheless, further evidence is needed to confirm this finding.

conclusionPBL may be a successful and an effective instructional strategy, not only medical, but also nursing and dental education. Students can learn skills and acquire competencies useful for their medical professionalism through PBL in addition to their existing knowledge.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateProblem-Based LearningThinkingHumansStudents, MedicalEducationMedicineProblem-based learningSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40155947
PMCPMC11951611

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.