Ninety-one years of midwifery continuity of care in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

backgroundMidwifery continuity of care during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum is essential for improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), however, challenges such as healthcare worker shortages, limited infrastructure, poor healthcare access, and cultural barriers often hinder the effective provision of midwifery services. These issues contribute to unsustainable and inadequate care, adversely affecting maternal and newborn health. This study examines the impact of these challenges on the midwifery continuity of care and its subsequent effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

methodsA scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We analyzed 43 articles published between 1932 and 2023 across four databases. Included studies were conducted in LMICs, focused on continuous care models, and published in English. The review aimed to capture the varied impacts of midwifery care on health outcomes.

resultsThe review found that midwifery continuity of care in LMICs significantly improves maternal and newborn health by reducing medical interventions, increasing physiological births, and enhancing maternal satisfaction and breastfeeding rates. The approach also lowers newborn mortality and morbidity. Success factors include community acceptance, midwives' cultural competence, and collaboration with traditional birth attendants. Barriers such as insufficient funding and resistance to change persist. Midwife-led continuity of care (MLCC) was associated with a 16% reduction in neonatal loss and a 24% reduction in pre-term births. Also, MLCC decreases newborn mortality by 10-20% and increases breastfeeding rates by up to 30%. Effective implementation requires integrating midwifery services into existing health systems, securing funding, expanding training, and strengthening community partnerships.

conclusionsMidwifery continuity of care enhances maternal and neonatal health in LMICs by minimizing unnecessary medical interventions and improving maternal satisfaction and breastfeeding outcomes. However, cultural and socioeconomic factors influence its acceptance. Further research is needed to integrate traditional birth attendants into formal health systems, overcome resistance to change, and develop strategies for effective collaboration between traditional and professional care providers.