Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40155972›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Could a hand-held, visual electrophysiology device theoretically reduce diagnostic waiting times for complex eye conditions in the NHS? A Discrete Event Simulation (DES) modelling study.

Steffen Bayer, Daniel Garillo, Marion Penn, Maria Chorozoglou, Sally Brailsford, Eloise Keeling, Fatima Shawkat, Perry Carter, Helena Lee, Jay E Self

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Steffen BayerSouthampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-467X
Daniel GarilloSouthampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Marion PennSouthampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Maria ChorozoglouSouthampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-4653
Sally BrailsfordSouthampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-8230
Eloise KeelingClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0399-359X
Fatima ShawkatOphthalmology Department, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Perry CarterOphthalmology Department, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9038-8333
Helena LeeClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2573-9536
Jay E SelfClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. jes3@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1030-9963

Funding

Gift of Sight appeal 0023Lana's fund and Southampton Hospitals Charity 1134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesVisual Electro-Diagnostic Testing (EDTs) are a highly specialised service in the NHS. The high cost of tests and a paucity of trained visual electrophysiologists has resulted in very few services across the UK and, when combined with increasing patient backlogs, has caused significant travel burden and variable waiting times. Here, we study the potential for impact on patients and services by adding a screening step to traditional referral pathways using an Electroretinogram (ERG) test from a relatively inexpensive, portable, hand-held EDT device; the RETeval SUBJECTS/

methodsWe model a large regional-referral EDT service using Discrete Event Simulation (DES) modelling based on retrospective patient data and published best evidence for the device. We evaluate the potential impact that adding the screening step in referral pathways could have on patient waiting times should the device prove to be safe and useable in clinical practice.

resultsWe demonstrate that should the RETeval

conclusionsThis work demonstrates that a RETeval

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyEye DiseasesWaiting ListsFemaleHumansMaleReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesState MedicineUnited KingdomDES modellingElectoretinogramElectrophysiologyOphthalmologyRETevalTM

Identifiers

PMID40155972
PMCPMC11951752

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.