SynthesisItalian journal of pediatrics2025
Effect of vigorous-intensity exercise on the working memory and inhibitory control among children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study primarily evaluated the effects of vigorous-intensity exercises on working memory and inhibitory control in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Search for eligible studies through four databases, and then proceed with screening. The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) Children with ADHD; (2) Randomised controlled trial; (3) The intervention group received exercise, while the control group did not perform any exercises as the treatment; (4) Conducted pre- and post-exercise assessments, which include working memory and inhibitory control parameters. Use the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool to evaluate the quality of the selected study. Select standardized mean difference as the appropriate effect scale index, and use Revman 5.4 software to analyze the mean difference. This study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42024597510). A total of ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for the meta-analysis. The included studies involved 367 males and 159 females, where 273 belonged to the exercise group and 253 from the control group. Participants in the exercise group enhanced working memory [0.37 (0.12, 0.63) p < 0.05, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.