ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025
Amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells as a therapeutic tool against cytokine storm: a comparison with umbilical cord counterparts.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differentiation potential of human amniotic fluid derived-mesenchymal stem cells into dopaminergic neurons.Anatomy & cell biology · 2026Article
- Nanomedicine beyond carriers - devices, cells & living therapeutics.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Review
- A Preliminary Study on Evaluating Reparative Regeneration Potential of Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Spheres in Stress Urinary Incontinence Rats.International journal of stem cells · 2026Article
- 3D Bioprinting of Blood Vessel Model for Improving Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Cytokine storm in severe bacterial infections: A Mini-Review of molecular insights and treatment strategies.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral immunosuppressive therapies have been proposed as key treatment options for critically ill patients since the first appearance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from different sources have been considered for their potential to attenuate the cytokine storm associated to COVID-19 and the consequent multi-organ failure, providing evidence for safe and efficacious treatments. Among them, administration of umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) has demonstrated a significant increase in survival rates, largely due to their potent immunosuppressive properties.
methodsWe applied next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis to compare the transcriptomic profiles of MSCs isolated from two gestational sources: amniotic fluid (AF) obtained during prenatal diagnosis and their clinically relevant umbilical cord counterparts, for which datasets were publicly available. A full meta-analysis was performed to identify suitable GEO and NGS datasets for comparison between AF- and UC-MSC samples.
resultsTranscriptome analysis revelaed significant differences between groups, despite both cell lines being strongly involved in the tissue development, crucial to achieve the complex task of wound healing. Significantly enriched hallmark genes suggest AF-MSC superior immunomodulatory features against signaling pathways actively involved in the cytokine storm (i.e., IL-2/STAT, TNF-a/NFkB, IL-2/STAT5, PI3K/AKT/mTOR).
conclusionsThe data presented here suggest that AF-MSCs hold significant promise for treating not only COVID-19-associated cytokine storms but also a variety of other inflammatory syndromes (i.e., those induced by bacterial infections, autoimmune disorders, and therapeutic interventions). Realizing the full potential of AF-MSCs as a comprehensive therapeutic approach in inflammatory disease management will require more extensive clinical trials and in-depth mechanistic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.