Evidence mapPaperPMID 40158082Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2025

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving curative therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jinxiang Peng, Haozhu Chen, Zhuang Chen, Jinmei Tan, Feng Wu, Xiaojuan Li

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The prognostic value of selected indices combination in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinxiang Peng *School of Chinese Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Haozhu Chen *School of Chinese Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Zhuang Chen *Fifth People's Hospital of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Jinmei TanGuizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Feng WuThe Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China. wf379738863@163.com.
Xiaojuan LiSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China. lixjuan3@163.com.

Funding

Hubei Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2023-2024 Chinese Medicine Young Talent Project ZY2023Q028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in HCC patients has been extensively studied; however, the prognostic value of NLR in HCC patients undergoing curative treatment remains unclear.

objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the precise significance of preoperative and postoperative NLR in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients receiving curative treatment.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to August 2024. Studies that included univariate and multivariate analyses evaluating the association between NLR and survival outcomes in HCC patients undergoing resection, transplantation, or ablation were included. The prognostic value of NLR in HCC patients receiving curative treatment was analyzed by calculating pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsA total of 43 studies involving 9,952 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that higher NLR was significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.39-1.75, P < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.49-2.10, P < 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.25-1.63, P < 0.001) in HCC patients undergoing curative treatment. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant association between NLR and poor OS, independent of geographic region, type of survival analysis, preoperative or postoperative measurement, treatment modality, or NLR cutoff value. Publication bias and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

conclusionElevated NLR is significantly associated with poorer OS, RFS, and DFS in HCC patients receiving curative treatment. Future research should focus on validating the optimal NLR threshold and exploring its predictive ability in different clinical settings.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLymphocytesNeutrophilsHumansLymphocyte CountPrognosisHepatocellular carcinomaMeta-analysisNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioSurvivalSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40158082
PMCPMC11954291

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.