Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40159816›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Impact of levator ani muscle avulsions on Manchester procedure outcomes: A 5-year follow-up study.

Sissel Hegdahl Oversand, Anne Cathrine Staff, Ingrid Volløyhaug, Rune Svenningsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02246387 (Does the Manchester Operation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Give Sufficient Apical Fixation?), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02246387 completednot on this map

Does the Manchester Operation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Give Sufficient Apical Fixation?

TypeobservationalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2014 to 2023Enrolled209ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmsManchester Operation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sissel Hegdahl OversandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0766-4523
Anne Cathrine StaffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid VolløyhaugFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9392-1674
Rune SvenningsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLevator ani muscle avulsion is a risk factor for inferior outcomes after native tissue pelvic organ prolapse repair. In a previously published study, we found no such association 1 year after the Manchester procedure (anterior repair combined with cardinal and uterosacral ligament suspension and perineal repair). The aim of the present study was to compare women with and without levator ani muscle avulsions in terms of patient-reported and anatomical outcomes, and failure rates in the same cohort after 5 years. MATERIAL AND

methodsFive-year prospective cohort study of 143 women operated on for anterior and/or mid-compartment pelvic organ prolapse with the Manchester procedure between October 2014 and January 2017, Clinical Trial study number NCT02246387. Levator ani muscle avulsions (uni- or bilateral) were diagnosed at inclusion by transperineal ultrasound. Primary outcome at 5-year follow-up was subjective bulge symptoms (question 3, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20). Secondary outcomes were total score from the same questionnaire, sexual distress (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12), subjective cure, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification scale measurements, defining optimal outcomes as anterior compartment stage <0-1 and mid-compartment point C ≤-5, and new surgical or conservative prolapse treatment.

resultsAmong 143 women followed up after 5 years, the avulsion rate was 52.4%. Both groups showed similar reductions in bulge symptoms, pelvic floor symptoms, and anatomical anterior- and mid-compartment measurements. Sexual distress improvement was significantly greater for women with avulsion (Mean change difference: -3.4 (-6.4 to -0.5)). Multivariate regression revealed no significant effect of avulsion on symptom scores, cure rates, or need for new prolapse treatment. Women with avulsion had half the odds of obtaining an optimal anterior compartment outcome compared to those without avulsion (adjusted odds ratio: 0.5 (0.2-0.9)).

conclusionsAlthough women with levator ani muscle avulsion had lower odds of achieving an optimal anterior compartment outcome, the overall anatomical changes from preoperative to 5 years were similar in both groups. Importantly, avulsion did not impact symptom improvement, patient-reported outcomes, or the need for further treatment. These findings support the Manchester procedure as an effective and durable surgical option for women with POP, regardless of avulsion status.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresPelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographygynecologic surgical procedurespelvic organ prolapsephysiologicalrecurrencesexual dysfunctiontreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID40159816
PMCPMC12087535

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.