ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Outcomes of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) sourced from a bank of prescreened anaerobically processed frozen donor stool has been available in South Australia since 2013. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world clinical and safety outcomes of FMT for recurrent, refractory, and/or severe or fulminant Methods: Donor screening test data were prospectively collected on all donors who passed prescreening evaluations between April 2013 and August 2023. The South Australian FMT for CDI database prospectively recorded outcomes for consecutive patients who underwent FMT for CDI from August 2013 to May 2023 in South Australia. Results: An overall 98 potential donors passed prescreening assessments and underwent laboratory screening tests: 32 (33%) had tests that failed, 5 (5%) had incomplete screening, and 61 (62%) passed. Detection of an extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organism (9/65, 14%) was the common reason for ineligibility following completion of screening tests. In total 220 cases of CDI were recorded, and follow-up data were available in 216. Primary cure occurred in 84% of cases (182/216): 88% (132/150) for recurrent CDI, 76% (50/66) for refractory CDI, 85% (51/60) for severe disease, and 65% (17/26) for fulminant disease. Repeat FMT was delivered in 23 of 34 cases (68%), with secondary cure in 74% (17/23 cases). Serious adverse events were observed in 6 patients overall (3%). No deaths were directly attributable to FMT. Conclusions: FMT was safe and efficacious for management of recurrent and refractory CDI over a 10-year period in a real-world prospective Australian cohort. Further studies to optimize the use of FMT for severe and fulminant CDI are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.