ReviewiScience2025
Elucidating neuroepigenetic mechanisms to inform targeted therapeutics for brain disorders.
Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic regulators polyphenols in neurodegenerative diseases: a promising intervention strategy.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- m6A RNA methylation in neural plasticity, brain aging, and neurodegenerative vulnerability.Molecular brain · 2026Review
- Quinone reductase 2bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Epigenetic Dysregulation in Neurodegenerative Disease: Implications for Neuropathology and Therapy.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evolving field of neuroepigenetics provides important insights into the molecular foundations of brain function. Novel sequencing technologies have identified patient-specific mutations and gene expression profiles involved in shaping the epigenetic landscape during neurodevelopment and in disease. Traditional methods to investigate the consequences of chromatin-related mutations provide valuable phenotypic insights but often lack information on the biochemical mechanisms underlying these processes. Recent studies, however, are beginning to elucidate how structural and/or functional aspects of histone, DNA, and RNA post-translational modifications affect transcriptional landscapes and neurological phenotypes. Here, we review the identification of epigenetic regulators from genomic studies of brain disease, as well as mechanistic findings that reveal the intricacies of neuronal chromatin regulation. We then discuss how these mechanistic studies serve as a guideline for future neuroepigenetics investigations. We end by proposing a roadmap to future therapies that exploit these findings by coupling them to recent advances in targeted therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.