ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
The application of computational fluid dynamics in hepatic portal vein haemodynamics research: a narrative review.
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The diagnosis and treatment of many liver diseases are related to the assessment of the hepatic portal vein (PV). Noninvasive methods (medical imaging) and invasive methods (hepatic vein catheterization) are commonly used to analyse the haemodynamic information of the PV. In recent years, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has emerged as a transformative tool in haemodynamics research, revolutionizing the understanding of blood flow behaviour, especially in various artery systems. The purpose of this review is the following: (I) introduce clinicians to CFD as a novel tool and describe its role in PV assessment; and (II) for clinicians and researchers who already use CFD, outline the progress in the application of CFD to the PV. Methods: The English-language literature published from 1987 (when the first study supporting the study's aim appeared) to 2024 was selected for inclusion in a narrative review. Key Content and Findings: This narrative review commences with an overview of principles of CFD and methods in PV studies, which involve model establishment, grid partitioning, boundary condition formulation, and error analysis. The focus then shifts to CFD's impact on the examination of the PV under different conditions such as portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis, PV thrombosis, post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure, and evaluation of the PV after liver transplantation. Finally, challenges and future directions about the CFD application in PV are outlined. Conclusions: CFD has potential application value in PV haemodynamics, but of the few studies available, most involve only small samples. Therefore, more research is needed to clarify the feasibility and reliability of this new tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.