ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025
The associations between circulating amino acids and arterial aneurysms and dissection: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Circulating amino acid levels can be altered in arterial aneurysms and dissection, but the relationships between them is unclear. The present study investigated the causal relationship between circulating amino acid levels and arterial aneurysms and dissection via bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods: A bidirectional two-sample MR analysis was used. Forward analysis was performed with amino acid levels as the exposure and arterial aneurysms and dissection as outcomes. Reverse analysis was performed with arterial aneurysms and dissection as exposures and circulating amino acid levels as outcomes. MR data were analyzed using five analytical methods: the inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR‒Egger, weighted median, simple, and weighted methods. IVW was used as the main analytical method, and the other methods were used for supplementary analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test, and horizontal pleiotropy was assessed using intercepts from MR‒Egger regression. The genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for circulating amino acids were obtained from the IEU open GWAS database and the GWAS Catalog database. The GWAS data for arterial aneurysms and dissection were obtained from the Finngen consortium database version R10. Results: The tyrosine level was negatively correlated with other aneurysms (P = 0.00211, OR: 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.40, 0.82). Aortic dissection decreased the circulating glycine level (P = 0.00168, OR: 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.98, 0.99). Conclusion: Through bidirectional MR analysis, we found that tyrosine level was negatively correlated with other aneurysms and that aortic dissection reduced circulating glycine. Our findings support a possible interaction between circulating amino acid levels and arterial aneurysms and dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.