ArticleJournal of plastic and reconstructive surgery2025
Scar Healing after Breast Reconstruction: A 5-year Follow-up in Asian Patients.
Article in Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Hypervascularity, hypertrophy, and hyperpigmentation of breast scars often persist for several years after reconstruction. There are few reports on the long-term follow-up of postoperative scars after breast reconstruction. We previously reported that at 1 year after reconstruction, >30% of Asian patients showed abnormal scars. In this study, we followed these patients for as long as 5 years postoperatively. Methods: We followed 101 Asian patients who underwent immediate two-stage implant-based breast reconstructions between 2013 and 2017 and still had abnormal scars involving hypervascularity, hypertrophy, or hyperpigmentation at 1 year postoperatively. We conducted annual follow-up for an additional 4 years, assessing the time until improvement and performing statistical analysis of factors related to the persistence and healing of abnormal scars. Results: Hypervascularity improved in 12%, 37%, 68%, and 82% of patients at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Most cases improved between 3 and 4 years postoperatively. Among the patients with both hypervascularity and hypertrophy at 1 year, 36% had residual hypervascularity at 5 years compared with 9.8% of those with hypervascularity only at 1 year. Hypertrophy improved within 5 years in 56% of the cases. Hyperpigmentation improved within 5 years in only 21% of the cases. There was no significant association between abnormal scars and age or body mass index. Conclusions: Even in Asian patients with persistent hypervascularity of breast scars, most cases improve within 5 years after reconstruction. However, hypervascularity tends to persist in cases that also show hypertrophy. Compared with hypervascularity and hypertrophy, hyperpigmentation showed worse 5-year improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.