ArticleCureus2025
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Psychometric and Nonparametric Analysis of a Retrospective Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This secondary analysis builds upon the results of a previous study conducted at the Centre of Hyperbaric Medicine, Ostrava City Hospital, Czech Republic, from 2019 to 2023. Statistically and clinically significant patient responses to hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in children with brain injuries were reported. The current study aims to replicate and extend this original work through a secondary analysis. By applying psychometric (reliability and validity) and non-parametric inferential techniques, this research seeks to elucidate previously unexplored data dimensions. The secondary analysis results indicated a moderate level of internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's alpha for the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) across multiple time points (r = 0.719). Due to the skewed nature of the data, non-parametric analyses were necessary. The Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) exhibited strong (r = 0.893) internal consistency. Regarding concurrent validity, robust positive Spearman's correlations (rs = 0.831, p < 0.001, 95% CI (0.615, 0.931)), (rs = 0.826, p < 0.001, 95% CI (0.605, 0.929)), (rs = 0.645, p = 0.002, CI (0.283, 0.846)), (rs = 0.598, p = 0.004, 95% CI (0.211, 0.823)) were found between pre-test and post-test HBOT GCS and GOS scores, highlighting their congruence. However, no significant Spearman correlation (rs = -0.205, p = 0.374, 95% CI (-0.594, 0.262)) emerged between the differences in post-treatment GCS and GOS scores. When analyzing gender differences, no statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney U = 43.5, Wilcoxen W = 109.5, p = 0.426) (Mann-Whitney U = 45.0, Wilcoxen W = 111.0, p = 0.512) were observed in GCS and GOS gender outcomes. Similarly, etiological comparisons between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) groups (Mann-Whitney U = 46.5, Wilcoxen W = 82.5, p = 0.910), (Mann-Whitney U = 42.0, Wilcoxen W = 120.0, p = 0.678) did not yield significant etiology differences. Finally, the repeated measures analysis showed a substantial and notable improvement (Wilcoxen Signed Rank Test: z = -2.956, p = 0.003, r = -0.645) in GCS scores following HBOT, indicating and confirming the treatment's large effect size. Ultimately, the GCS showed moderate internal consistency across different time points, while the GOS had high internal consistency. Positive Spearman's correlations between pre-test and post-test HBOT GCS and GOS scores supported their concurrent validity. However, no significant relationship was found between post-treatment changes in GCS and GOS. There were no significant gender differences in outcomes or significant differences between TBI and HIE groups. Finally, a repeated measures analysis showed a significant and considerable improvement in GCS scores after HBOT, indicating substantial treatment effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.