ArticlePeerJ2025
A cost-effective predictive tool for AFP-negative focal hepatic lesions of retrospective study: enhancing clinical triage and decision-making.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: a health economic evaluation.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- From Large-Scale Characterization to Subgroup-Specific Predictive Modeling: A Study on the Diagnostic Value of Liver Stiffness Measurements in Focal Liver Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identifying alpha-fetal protein (AFP)-negative focal hepatic lesions presents a significant challenge, particularly in China. We sought to develop an economically portable tool for the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver lesions with AFP-negative status, and explore its clinical diagnostic efficiency. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from January 2017 to February 2023, including a total of 348 inpatients with AFP-negative liver space-occupying lesions. The study used a training set of 252 inpatients from January 2017 to September 2021 to establish a diagnostic model for differentiating benign and malignant AFP-negative liver space-occupying lesions. Additionally, a validation cohort of 96 inpatients from October 2021 to February 2023 was used to confirm the diagnostic performance of the model. From January 2017 to February 2023, patients at JingNing People's Hospital, Gansu Province were assigned to the external cohort ( Results: A predictive tool was established by screening age, gender, hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected, single lesion, alanine amino transferase (ALT), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) using multivariate logistic regression analysis and clinical practice. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.911 (95% CI [0.873-0.949]) in the training set and 0.882 (95% CI [0.815-0.949]) in the validation cohort. In addition, the model achieved an area under the curve of 0.811 (95% CI [0.687-0.935]) in the external validation cohort. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that the predictive tool has the characteristics of good diagnostic efficiency, economy and convenience, which is helpful for the clinical triage and decision-making of AFP-negative liver space-occupying lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.