Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40161400›Full record

ArticleComputational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Bayesian Workflow for Generative Modeling in Computational Psychiatry.

Alexander J Hess, Sandra Iglesias, Laura Köchli, Stephanie Marino, Matthias Müller-Schrader, Lionel Rigoux, Christoph Mathys, Olivia K Harrison, Jakob Heinzle, Stefan Frässle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander J HessTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2991-7387
Sandra IglesiasTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1778-7239
Laura KöchliTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0038-9592
Stephanie MarinoTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6559-9072
Matthias Müller-SchraderTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-9230
Lionel RigouxMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-8931
Christoph MathysInteracting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-5453
Olivia K HarrisonTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0897-7142
Jakob HeinzleTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-041X
Stefan FrässleTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8011-2226
Klaas Enno StephanTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-9092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational (generative) modelling of behaviour has considerable potential for clinical applications. In order to unlock the potential of generative models, reliable statistical inference is crucial. For this, Bayesian workflow has been suggested which, however, has rarely been applied in Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry (TN/CP) so far. Here, we present a worked example of Bayesian workflow in the context of a typical application scenario for TN/CP. This application example uses Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF) models, a family of computational models for hierarchical Bayesian belief updating. When equipped with a suitable response model, HGF models can be fit to behavioural data from cognitive tasks; these data frequently consist of binary responses and are typically univariate. This poses challenges for statistical inference due to the limited information contained in such data. We present a novel set of response models that allow for simultaneous inference from multivariate (here: two) behavioural data types. Using both simulations and empirical data from a speed-incentivised associative reward learning (SPIRL) task, we show that models harnessing information from two different data streams (binary responses and continuous response times) ensure robust inference (specifically, identifiability of parameters and models). Moreover, we find a linear relationship between log-transformed response times in the SPIRL task and participants' uncertainty about the outcome. Our analysis illustrates the benefits of Bayesian workflow for a typical use case in TN/CP. We argue that adopting Bayesian workflow for generative modelling helps increase the transparency and robustness of results, which in turn is of fundamental importance for the long-term success of TN/CP.

Indexed as

Bayesian WorkflowComputational PsychiatryHierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF)multimodal response modelsrobust inferenceTranslational Neuromodeling

Identifiers

PMID40161400
PMCPMC11951975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.