ReviewRegenerative therapy2025
Navigating mesenchymal stem cells doses and delivery routes in heart disease trials: A comprehensive overview.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of pulmonary fibrosis: From disease mechanisms to future novel therapies (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Stem Cells and Their Derivatives in Cardiac Fibrosis Therapy: Challenges and Perspectives.Cells · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, various clinical trials have been designed and implemented using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the treatment of heart diseases. Clinical trials exploring MSC-based treatments have proliferated, yet the lack of standardized protocols for MSC administration remains a significant challenge. Despite the growing popularity of MSC trials, questions persist regarding optimal dosing, administration routes, and frequency to achieve safety and efficacy, particularly in the context of cardiac regeneration. The current study has reviewed the clinical trials that have used MSCs for the treatment of heart diseases since 2009. The findings reveal diverse transplantation methods and varying MSCs quantities, highlighting the absence of a universal guideline for MSCs utilization in heart disease clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.