Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162173›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Digital transformation of nephrology POCUS education-Integrating a multiagent, artificial intelligence, and human collaboration-enhanced curriculum with expert feedback.

Mohammad S Sheikh, Kianoush B Kashani, James R Gregoire, Charat Thongprayoon, Jing Miao, Iasmina M Craici, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Fawad M Qureshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Shaping the Future of AI in Organ Transplantation: Position Paper of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad S SheikhDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9388-8505
Kianoush B KashaniDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-3683
James R GregoireDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.
Charat ThongprayoonDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8313-3604
Jing MiaoDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-9740
Iasmina M CraiciDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.
Wisit CheungpasitpornDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9954-9711
Fawad M QureshiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-4882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The digital transformation in medical education is reshaping how clinical skills, such as point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), are taught. In nephrology fellowship programs, POCUS is essential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, guiding procedures, and optimizing patient management. To address these evolving demands, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven POCUS curriculum using a multiagent approach that integrates human expertise with advanced AI models, thereby elevating educational standards and better preparing fellows for contemporary clinical practice. Methods: In April 2024, the Mayo Clinic Minnesota Nephrology Fellowship Program initiated a novel AI-assisted process to design a comprehensive POCUS curriculum. This process integrated multiple advanced AI models-including GPT-4.0, Claude 3.0 Opus, Gemini Advanced, and Meta AI with Llama 3-to generate initial drafts and iteratively refine content. A panel of blinded nephrology POCUS experts subsequently reviewed and modified the AI-generated material to ensure both clinical relevance and educational rigor. Results: The curriculum underwent 12 iterative revisions, incorporating feedback from 29 communications across AI models. Key features of the final curriculum included expanded core topics, diversified teaching methods, enhanced assessment tools, and integration into inpatient and outpatient nephrology rotations. The curriculum emphasized quality assurance, POCUS limitations, and essential clinical applications, such as fistula/graft evaluation and software integration. Alignment with certification standards further strengthened its utility. AI models contributed significantly to the curriculum's foundational structure, while human experts provided critical clinical insights. Conclusion: This curriculum, enhanced through a multiagent approach that combines AI and human collaboration, exemplifies the transformative potential of digital tools in nephrology education. The innovative framework seamlessly integrates advanced AI models with expert clinical insights, providing a scalable model for medical curriculum development that is responsive to evolving educational demands. The synergy between technological innovation and human expertise holds promising implications for advancing fellowship training. Future studies should evaluate its impact on clinical competencies and patient outcomes across diverse practice environments.

Indexed as

AI-assisted learningArtificial intelligenceclinical skills trainingcurriculum developmentdiagnostic accuracydigital educationmedical education innovationnephrologynephrology fellowshippoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)ultrasound-guided procedures

Identifiers

PMID40162173
PMCPMC11951877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.