ArticleIntensive care medicine2025
A consensus of European experts on the definition of ventilator-associated pneumonia recurrences obtained by the Delphi method: the RECUVAP study.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical application of a novel gravity-weighted continuous oral suction dental pad in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated patients.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Update on infection: from prevention to diagnosis and management.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- A consensus of international experts on definition, sampling, treatment, and prevention of peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannula-site infection obtained by the Delphi method: the SAVECMO study.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Duration Matters: Tailoring Antibiotic Therapy for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of respiratory viruses detection on outcomes in ventilated nosocomial pneumonia: an exposed/unexposed study.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are recognized diagnostic criteria for a first ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) episode, but not for recurrences. Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have used the recurrence of VAP as a criterion for efficacy evaluation. Still, the different definitions used in RCTs make it difficult to compare studies. We aimed to develop a consensual definition of VAP recurrences and of the various types of VAP recurrences.
methodsThirty-six European experts constituting a multidisciplinary group of physicians (critical care, infectious diseases, microbiology) with special interest in the management of VAP were polled using the Delphi methodology.
resultsAfter the completion of four iterations of the DELPHI method, 94% of experts agreed that the diagnostic criteria for a first VAP episode could also be used for recurrences, except for the radiological criterion, which not all the experts considered to be mandatory. Consensus was also reached regarding the definition of four distinct entities: relapse, persistent VAP, superinfection, and new-pathogen VAP. For relapse and persistent VAP, bacteriological findings were identical for different VAP episodes, whereas they differed for superinfection and new-pathogen VAP. The distinction between relapse and persistent VAP, and between superinfection and new-pathogen VAP depended on the timing of antibiotic treatment (before or after 48-72 h after the end of antibiotic therapy) and the clinical course. Microbiological criteria were proposed to facilitate the diagnosis of persistent VAP.
conclusionThis consensus by European experts proposes four different VAP recurrence entities which should facilitate the harmonization of recurrence criteria for clinical practice and future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40163131What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.