ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025
Evaluation of a New Fully Automatic OLCR Biometer: Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement with an SS-OCT Biometer.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to evaluate the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of the LUS-1000 Plus, a new fully automatic optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR)-based biometer, and its agreement with the IOLMaster 700, a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)-based biometer, for biometric measurement.
methodsThis prospective study included 77 right eyes from 77 healthy participants. The axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), flattest, steepest, mean keratometry (Kf, Ks, Km), astigmatism magnitude (AST), J
resultsRepeatability and reproducibility analysis revealed low S
conclusionThe LUS-1000 Plus demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility, and excellent agreement with the IOLMaster 700, confirming its reliability and interchangeable use with the IOLMaster 700 in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.