Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163233›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025

Evaluation of a New Fully Automatic OLCR Biometer: Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement with an SS-OCT Biometer.

Chak Seng Lei, Xinning Yang, Rui Ning, Jinxuan Xiahou, Xinyu Jiang, Giacomo Savini, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Xingtao Zhou, Kexin Li, Jinhai Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chak Seng Lei *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xinning Yang *School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Rui NingEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jinxuan XiahouEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xinyu JiangEye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Giacomo SaviniIRCCS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Domenico Schiano-LomorielloIRCCS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Xingtao ZhouEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kexin LiEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. kexinli@fudan.edu.cn.
Jinhai HuangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. vip999vip@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-3175

Funding

EYE & ENT Hospital of Fudan University High-level Talents Program 2021318Medical Engineering Fund of Fudan University yg2023-06Medical Engineering Fund of Fudan University yg2023-26Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning TP2022046Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 22S11900200Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23XD1420500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to evaluate the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of the LUS-1000 Plus, a new fully automatic optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR)-based biometer, and its agreement with the IOLMaster 700, a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)-based biometer, for biometric measurement.

methodsThis prospective study included 77 right eyes from 77 healthy participants. The axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), flattest, steepest, mean keratometry (Kf, Ks, Km), astigmatism magnitude (AST), J

resultsRepeatability and reproducibility analysis revealed low S

conclusionThe LUS-1000 Plus demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility, and excellent agreement with the IOLMaster 700, confirming its reliability and interchangeable use with the IOLMaster 700 in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AgreementBiometryOptical low coherence reflectometryRepeatabilityReproducibilitySwept-source optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID40163233
PMCPMC12006609

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.