ArticleBJGP open2025
Changes in heart failure healthcare in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote healthcare for the management of long-term conditions, including heart failure (HF). However, little is known about the experiences of this transition, knowledge developed during service transformation, and/or the preferences of clinicians and patients with HF going forward.
aimThis study aimed to determine the perspectives and consensus of healthcare providers, patients, and carers in the UK regarding the transition to remote healthcare for HF during the pandemic. DESIGN &
settingA survey was conducted among individuals with HF and healthcare providers.
methodAn evaluation of stakeholders' views and a consensus-development exercise regarding the use of telehealth and home monitoring devices were conducted using a modified Delphi process on an online platform. This study primarily included patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
resultsFindings revealed a significant reliance on telehealth, which reportedly enhanced accessibility for patients. Integration of home monitoring devices and systems was deemed crucial for continuity of care. Although there was some consensus concerning the usefulness of remote consultations and communication, findings also highlighted their limitations and disparities in digital access and literacy.
conclusionRemote healthcare presents opportunities and risks, emphasising the need for equitable access to telehealth technologies and thoughtful integration into healthcare systems. Balancing remote and in-person care, along with targeted training for healthcare providers, is essential for effective management and support of people with long-term conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.