Evidence mapPaperPMID 40165084Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Integration of epigenomic and genomic data to predict residual feed intake and the feed conversion ratio in dairy sheep via machine learning algorithms.

Pablo Augusto de Souza Fonseca, Aroa Suarez-Vega, Cristina Esteban-Blanco, Héctor Marina, Rocío Pelayo, Beatriz Gutiérrez-Gil, Juan-José Arranz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pablo Augusto de Souza FonsecaDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, Leon, 24007, Spain.
Aroa Suarez-VegaDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, Leon, 24007, Spain.
Cristina Esteban-BlancoDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, Leon, 24007, Spain.
Héctor MarinaDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, Leon, 24007, Spain.
Rocío PelayoDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, Leon, 24007, Spain.
Beatriz Gutiérrez-GilDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, Leon, 24007, Spain.
Juan-José ArranzDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, Leon, 24007, Spain. jjarrs@unileon.es.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program No 772787 (SMARTER)Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades María Zambrano
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeed efficiency (FE) is an essential trait in livestock species because of the constant demand to increase the productivity and sustainability of livestock production systems. A better understanding of the biological mechanisms associated with FEs might help improve the estimation and selection of superior animals. In this work, differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified via genome-wide bisulfite sequencing (GWBS) by comparing the DNA methylation profiles of milk somatic cells from dairy ewes that were divergent in terms of residual feed intake. The DMRs were identified by comparing divergent groups for residual feed intake (RFI), the feed conversion ratio (FCR), and the consensus between both metrics (Cons). Additionally, the predictive performance of these DMRs and genetic variants mapped within these regions was evaluated via three machine learning (ML) models (xgboost, random forest (RF), and multilayer feedforward artificial neural network (deeplearning)). The average performance of each model was based on the root mean squared error (RMSE) and squared Spearman correlation (rho2). Finally, the best model for each scenario was selected on the basis of the highest ratio between rho2 and RMSE.

resultsIn total, 12,257, 9,328, and 6,723 genes were annotated for DMRs detected in the RFI, FCR, and Cons groups, respectively. These genes are associated with important pathways for regulating FE in dairy sheep, such as protein digestion and absorption, hormone synthesis and secretion, control of energy availability, cellular signaling, and feed behavior pathways. With respect to the ML predictions, the smallest mean RMSE (0.17) was obtained using RF, which was used to predict RFI. The highest mean rho

conclusionsThe results provide new insights into the biological mechanisms associated with FE and the control of these processes through epigenetic mechanisms. Additionally, the potential use of epigenetic information as a biomarker for the prediction of FE can be suggested based on the obtained results.

Indexed as

EatingEpigenomicsGenomicsMachine LearningAlgorithmsAnimal FeedAnimalsDairyingDNA MethylationFemaleMilkSheepArtificial intelligenceFeed efficiencyLivestockOmicsPrediction

Identifiers

PMID40165084
PMCPMC11956460

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.