Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165185›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Harness machine learning for multiple prognoses prediction in sepsis patients: evidence from the MIMIC-IV database.

Su-Zhen Zhang, Hai-Yi Ding, Yi-Ming Shen, Bing Shao, Yuan-Yuan Gu, Qiu-Hua Chen, Hai-Dong Zhang, Ying-Hao Pei, Hua Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Su-Zhen Zhang *Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Hai-Yi Ding *Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yi-Ming ShenAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Bing ShaoAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yuan-Yuan GuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 155 Han Zhong Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Qiu-Hua ChenDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 155 Han Zhong Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Hai-Dong ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 155 Han Zhong Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Ying-Hao PeiDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 155 Han Zhong Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China. piaopiao5556@njucm.edu.cn.
Hua JiangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 155 Han Zhong Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China. yfy0096@njucm.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis, a severe systemic response to infection, frequently results in adverse outcomes, underscoring the urgency for prompt and accurate prognostic tools. Machine learning methods such as logistic regression, random forests, and CatBoost, have shown potential in early sepsis prediction. The study aimed to create and verify a machine learning model capable of early prognostic identification of patients with sepsis in intensive care units (ICUs).

methodsPatients adhering to inclusion and exclusion criteria from the MIMIC-IV v2.2 database were divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Initially, we employed difference analysis to assess the significance of each variable and subsequently screened relevant features with multinomial logistic regression analysis. Logistic regression, random forest, and CatBoost algorithms were used to construct machine learning models to predict rapid recovery, chronic critical illness, and mortality in sepsis. The models were compared through several evaluation indexes including precision, accuracy, recall, F1 score, and the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve(AUC) in the validation set to select the optimal model. The best model was visualized and interpreted utilizing the Shapley Additive explanations method.

results13174 sepsis patients were included. Post the screening process,26 clinical features were obtained to develop three distinct machine learning models. CatBoost exhibited superior performance among the three models with a weighted AUC of 0.771. The prognosis with the highest predictive performance was mortality (AUC = 0.804), followed by the prognoses of rapid recovery (AUC = 0.773) and chronic critical illness(AUC = 0.737). Urine output, respiratory rate, and temperature were the top three important features for the whole model prediction.

conclusionThe machine learning model developed leveraging the CatBoost algorithm demonstrates the latent capacity to identify sepsis prognosis early. It also suggests that interventions targeting factors such as urine output, respiratory status, and temperature in the early stage may potentially alter the adverse prognosis of sepsis patients. However, the model will still require further external validation in the future.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSepsisAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisChronic critical illnessMachine learningModel interpretabilityPredictive modelSepsis

Identifiers

PMID40165185
PMCPMC11959728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.