ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Harness machine learning for multiple prognoses prediction in sepsis patients: evidence from the MIMIC-IV database.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weak-Supervision Expectation-Maximization Framework for Identifying Decisional Vulnerability in Older Emergency Department Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Mortality and Outcome Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence- and Machine Learning-Assisted Subphenotyping for Personalized Immunotherapy in Sepsis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence based predictive models for early sepsis detection in intensive care units: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis, a severe systemic response to infection, frequently results in adverse outcomes, underscoring the urgency for prompt and accurate prognostic tools. Machine learning methods such as logistic regression, random forests, and CatBoost, have shown potential in early sepsis prediction. The study aimed to create and verify a machine learning model capable of early prognostic identification of patients with sepsis in intensive care units (ICUs).
methodsPatients adhering to inclusion and exclusion criteria from the MIMIC-IV v2.2 database were divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Initially, we employed difference analysis to assess the significance of each variable and subsequently screened relevant features with multinomial logistic regression analysis. Logistic regression, random forest, and CatBoost algorithms were used to construct machine learning models to predict rapid recovery, chronic critical illness, and mortality in sepsis. The models were compared through several evaluation indexes including precision, accuracy, recall, F1 score, and the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve(AUC) in the validation set to select the optimal model. The best model was visualized and interpreted utilizing the Shapley Additive explanations method.
results13174 sepsis patients were included. Post the screening process,26 clinical features were obtained to develop three distinct machine learning models. CatBoost exhibited superior performance among the three models with a weighted AUC of 0.771. The prognosis with the highest predictive performance was mortality (AUC = 0.804), followed by the prognoses of rapid recovery (AUC = 0.773) and chronic critical illness(AUC = 0.737). Urine output, respiratory rate, and temperature were the top three important features for the whole model prediction.
conclusionThe machine learning model developed leveraging the CatBoost algorithm demonstrates the latent capacity to identify sepsis prognosis early. It also suggests that interventions targeting factors such as urine output, respiratory status, and temperature in the early stage may potentially alter the adverse prognosis of sepsis patients. However, the model will still require further external validation in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.