ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2025
Rotigotine safety in real-world settings: a pharmacovigilance study using FAERS data.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis pharmacovigilance study aims to assess adverse reactions to rotigotine based on spontaneous reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, providing insights for clinical dosing.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using FAERS data from Q2 2007 to Q2 2024, employing four disproportionality analysis methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multinomial Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS). These methods were utilized to detect and evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with rotigotine.
resultsThe dataset retrieved from the FAERS, encompassing 17,522,075 reports, a subset of 7,570 AE reports specifically implicated rotigotine. Upon analysis, 172 preferred terms (PTs) exhibited significant disproportionality and were consistently identified by the four employed algorithms. Particularly, product adhesion issue(N = 1,336, ROR 115,28 [108.94-121.98], PRR 108.46 [135850.43], EBGM 103.57 [98.79], IC (5.03) [5.03]) emerged as the predominant AE. Serious and unexpected AEs, such as drug ineffectiveness(N = 651, ROR 1.32 [ 1.22-1.43], PRR 1.31 [50.04], EBGM 1.31 [1.23], IC 0.39 [-1.27]), fall incidents(N = 361, ROR 2.93 [2.64-3.25 ], PRR 2.9 [451.76], EBGM 2.9 [2.66], IC 1.54 [-0.13]), and Parkinson's disease(N = 345, ROR 51.57 [46.31-57.42], PRR 50.79 [16476.71], EBGM 49.7 [45.43], IC 5.64 [3.97], were also recorded.The majority of these AEs were reported within the initial 30 days of therapy (n = 298, 22.1%), whereas a significant number were noted after 360 days of treatment (n = 507, 36.2%). The median time to the onset of AEs was 213 days.
conclusionOur findings, which align with the established safety profile of rotigotine, reveal the presence of unexpected serious AEs and emphasize the importance of continued vigilance in post-marketing surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.