ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Genetic and Genomic Literacy of Healthcare Providers Treating Anorexia Nervosa in the United States: A Mixed Methods, Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic testing has the potential to transform the prevention, treatment, and management of anorexia nervosa (AN) as it has for other conditions. However, healthcare providers require the knowledge and openness to implement genetic testing effectively.
objectivesThis study had two main objectives, first, to determine the genomic literacy of those treating AN in the United States and second to assess the viewpoints of these healthcare providers on genetic testing and research, and the influence of genetics on AN.
methodsA mixed methods approach combining the GKnowM, a validated genomic literacy tool, Likert-like statements and thematic analysis of free-text responses was used. Participant consent, dissemination of the survey, and response collection were performed through Qualtrics.
resultsParticipant's average GKnowM score was 19.6 (SD = 2.8) on a scale of 0-26 (75% correct). Positive correlations were identified between GKnowM score and responses to questions about the influence of genetics on AN and the importance of genetics research, and negative correlations were found between age and years in practice and views on the current value of genetic testing. In addition, participants communicated a need for more genetics learning opportunities, and the challenge of accessing and paying for quality AN treatment in the United States. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate a need for targeted genetics and genomics learning opportunities for healthcare providers. Improving genomic literacy has the potential to positively influence attitudes toward genetic research and testing and empower healthcare providers to engage in productive and scientifically sound discussions with their patients and society as a whole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.