SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
A scoping review of financial decision-making measures in midlife and beyond: results from the advancing reliable measurement in cognitive aging and decision-making ability (ARMCADA) study.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of emotion and non-cognitive measures of decision-making ability in older adults by the ARMCADA study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cognitive decline in older adults affects key functions such as memory, concentration, planning, reasoning, and decision-making (DM). This decline in cognitive abilities compromises basic DM skills, with growing evidence that DM can decline before noticeable impairment or an official cognitive impairment diagnosis, adversely impacting quality of life and leading to negative outcomes in financial management and daily activities. Objective: This scoping review aims to identify and evaluate existing measures of financial decision-making (FDM) abilities in clinical and community-dwelling populations aged 45 and older. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in EMBASE (Elsevier), PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsychARTICLES, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2018 and November 2023. The multi-domain scoping review yielded 16,278 records. Title and abstract, as well as full-text screenings, respectively, were completed by two reviewers and conflicts were resolved by PhD level researchers. We then extracted data from the full-text articles. Results: The scoping review yielded 154 articles with 96 unique measures. The most frequently used measures were variations of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), The Legal Capacity for Property Law Transactions Assessment Scale (LCPLTAS), the Decision-making Competence Assessment Tool (DMCAT), the temporal discounting paradigm, and the Short Form version of the Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI-SF). Commonly used measures of financial decision-making (FDM) often assessed specific aspects, such as risk-taking behavior and basic financial knowledge. Discussion: Many of the FDM measures found in this scoping review were developed for use in laboratory settings, and less is known about potential for clinical use adaptation. Future work addressing this measurement gap could significantly enhance early interventions to ameliorate or mitigate decline, thereby improving financial management and quality of life for at-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.