ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Inducing asymmetric gait in healthy walkers: a review.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Reference Values for Dynamic Plantar Pressure Assessment in Healthy Young Adults: Sex Differences and Bilateral Symmetry.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Muscle synergy asymmetry between the affected and unaffected limbs during the stance phase in unilateral flatfoot.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Lower Limb Symmetry Index in Cavus and Normal Feet by Means of a Baropodometric Platform: A Case-Control Study.International wound journal · 2026Article
- An Intelligent Pressurized Thigh Band for Muscular Assistance and Multi-Mode Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gait symmetry between both legs is a typical hallmark of healthy walking. In contrast, several pathologies induce asymmetry in the gait pattern, regarding both spatial and temporal features. This can be due to either an asymmetrical change of the body morphology-e.g., after an amputation or an injury-or a damage in the brain-such as stroke or cerebral palsy. This deficit in gait symmetry usually induces higher metabolic effort in locomotion and might further accelerate severe comorbidities such as osteoarthritis and low back pain. Consequently, several assistive devices-such as active exoskeletons or prostheses-are currently developed to mitigate gait asymmetry and restore a healthier gait pattern. Typically, the development of such devices requires extensive tests and validations, and it is practically and ethically not always desirable to recruit disabled patients to run these tests in the preliminary stages of development. In this review paper, we collect and analyse the different reversible interventions described in the literature that can induce asymmetry in the gait pattern of healthy walkers. We perform a systematic literature research by exploring five databases, i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. This narrative review identifies more than 150 articles reporting 16 different interventional methods used to induce asymmetric gait pattern in healthy walkers or with the potential to do so. These interventions are categorized according to their mode of action, and their effects on spatiotemporal parameters, joint kinematics and kinetics are summarized adopting a macroscopic viewpoint. Interventions are compared in terms of efficacy, maturity of the results, and applicability. Recommendations are provided for guiding researchers in the field in using each of the identified manipulations in its most relevant research contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.