Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166490›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025

Difficulties in Care and Unmet Needs from the Perspective of Patients with Lung Cancer and Stroke - A Qualitative Study in Germany.

Hella Fügemann, Kathrin Gödde, Ute Goerling, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn, Verena Mauckisch, Bob Siegerink, Nina Rieckmann, Christine Holmberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hella FügemannInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Kathrin GöddeInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Ute GoerlingCharité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Jacqueline Müller-NordhornBayerisches Krebsregister, Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Nürnberg, Germany.
Verena MauckischDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care Medicine with Sleep Medicine, Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Bob SiegerinkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Nina RieckmannInstitute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Christine HolmbergInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-4620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Organizing healthcare becomes ever more complex for people with chronic conditions. Additionally, a distinct separation of inpatient and outpatient care makes it even more difficult to provide coordinated and continuous care across sectors in Germany. Our interview study aimed to identify difficulties and unmet needs along the care continuum of patients with lung cancer and stroke in Germany. Methods: Data were collected by qualitative interviews. A total of 40 participants with lung cancer (n=20) and stroke (n=20) were interviewed in the metropolitan region of Berlin, Germany. Data were interpreted through thematic analysis. Results: We identified five main categories of difficulties and unmet needs: 1. Bureaucracy, 2. Unmet information needs, 3. Feeling left alone, 4. Difficulties and unmet needs in healthcare institution settings, and 5. Psychological and emotional stress. Results of our study show a high overlap between the experienced difficulties of both groups of patients. These include, in particular, bureaucratic obstacles, the lack of detailed information, poor coordination of care, and the feeling of being alone with the disease and its consequences. Conclusion: Patients with complex care trajectories seem to have great need for coordinative, social, bureaucratic, and emotional support and these support topics are largely independent of the index disease. Hence, our research suggests that support offers focusing on social and coordination needs do not have to be disease-specific but can rather cover general needs of people with complex care situations.

Indexed as

complex carelung cancerpatient experiencesqualitative researchstrokeunmet needs

Identifiers

PMID40166490
PMCPMC11956712

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.