ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Determinants of Qigong, Tai Chi, and Yoga Use for Health Conditions: A Systematic Review Protocol.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMind-body movement interventions such as qi gong, tai chi, and yoga are recommended in clinical practice guidelines to improve outcomes for several health conditions. However, use of these interventions for health conditions, or the integration of these interventions within healthcare settings, is low. A systematic synthesis of implementation determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators) is needed to increase adoption. Similarly, determinants may influence other implementation outcomes, such as scalability or sustainability of these interventions in a healthcare system or community organization. Thus, in conducting this review we aim to identify determinants of qi gong, tai chi, and yoga use for health conditions. The secondary aim is to evaluate whether barriers and facilitators differ by intervention type, health condition, implementation setting, or implementation outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo) through May 2024 and a grey literature search (Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO Clinical Trials database) through March 2025. We will include original research articles in English that identify barriers and facilitators to adoption of qi gong, tai chi, and yoga by adults with health conditions. Study quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We will code each article using a codebook informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a comprehensive taxonomy of implementation determinants. Findings will be presented as a narrative synthesis. We will report on how barriers and facilitators may relate to intervention type (qi gong, tai chi, yoga), health condition (e.g., low back pain, fall prevention), implementation settings (e.g., primary care clinic, community organization) or implementation outcome (e.g., adoption, sustainability). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval will not be obtained for this review of published, publicly accessible data. The results from this systematic review will be disseminated through conference presentations and journal publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.