Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166581›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Feature Extraction Tool Using Temporal Landmarks in Arterial Blood Pressure and Photoplethysmography Waveforms.

Ravi Pal, Akos Rudas, Tiffany Williams, Jeffrey N Chiang, Anna Barney, Maxime Cannesson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ravi PalDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Akos RudasDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tiffany WilliamsDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey N ChiangDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anna BarneyInstitute of Sound and Vibration Research (ISVR), University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Maxime CannessonDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Machine Learning of Physiological Waveforms and Electronic Health Record Data to Predict, Diagnose, and Treat Hemodynamic Instability in Surgical PatientsR01HL144692 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Biomedical Informatics Tools for Applied Perioperative PhysiologyR01EB029751 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
Personalized Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection of Postoperative Failure to RescueR01EB035028 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Maxime Cannesson · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144692NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029751NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB035028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial blood pressure (ABP) and photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms both contain vital physiological information for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Extracted features from these waveforms have diverse clinical applications, including predicting hyper- and hypo-tension, estimating cardiac output from ABP, and monitoring blood pressure and nociception from PPG. However, the lack of standardized tools for feature extraction limits their exploration and clinical utilization. In this study, we propose an automatic feature extraction tool that first detects temporal location of landmarks within each cardiac cycle of ABP and PPG waveforms, including the systolic phase onset, systolic phase peak, dicrotic notch, and diastolic phase peak using the iterative envelope mean method. Then, based on these landmarks, extracts 852 features per cardiac cycle, encompassing time-, statistical-, and frequency-domains. The tool's ability to detect landmarks was evaluated using ABP and PPG waveforms from a large perioperative dataset (MLORD dataset) comprising 17,327 patients. We analyzed 34,267 cardiac cycles of ABP waveforms and 33,792 cardiac cycles of PPG waveforms. Additionally, to assess the tool's real-time landmark detection capability, we retrospectively analyzed 3,000 cardiac cycles of both ABP and PPG waveforms, collected from a Philips IntelliVue MX800 patient monitor. The tool's detection performance was assessed against markings by an experienced researcher, achieving average F1-scores and error rates for ABP and PPG as follows: (1) On MLORD dataset: systolic phase onset (99.77 %, 0.35 % and 99.52 %, 0.75 %), systolic phase peak (99.80 %, 0.30 % and 99.56 %, 0.70 %), dicrotic notch (98.24 %, 2.63 % and 98.72 %, 1.96 %), and diastolic phase peak (98.59 %, 2.11 % and 98.88 %, 1.73 %); (2) On real time data: systolic phase onset (98.18 %, 3.03 % and 97.94 %, 3.43 %), systolic phase peak (98.22 %, 2.97 % and 97.74 %, 3.77 %), dicrotic notch (97.72 %, 3.80 % and 98.16 %, 3.07 %), and diastolic phase peak (98.04 %, 3.27 % and 98.08 %, 3.20 %). This tool has significant potential for supporting clinical utilization of ABP and PPG waveform features and for facilitating feature-based machine learning models for various clinical applications where features derived from these waveforms play a critical role.

Identifiers

PMID40166581
PMCPMC11957180

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.