ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Feature Extraction Tool Using Temporal Landmarks in Arterial Blood Pressure and Photoplethysmography Waveforms.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arterial blood pressure (ABP) and photoplethysmography (PPG) waveforms both contain vital physiological information for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Extracted features from these waveforms have diverse clinical applications, including predicting hyper- and hypo-tension, estimating cardiac output from ABP, and monitoring blood pressure and nociception from PPG. However, the lack of standardized tools for feature extraction limits their exploration and clinical utilization. In this study, we propose an automatic feature extraction tool that first detects temporal location of landmarks within each cardiac cycle of ABP and PPG waveforms, including the systolic phase onset, systolic phase peak, dicrotic notch, and diastolic phase peak using the iterative envelope mean method. Then, based on these landmarks, extracts 852 features per cardiac cycle, encompassing time-, statistical-, and frequency-domains. The tool's ability to detect landmarks was evaluated using ABP and PPG waveforms from a large perioperative dataset (MLORD dataset) comprising 17,327 patients. We analyzed 34,267 cardiac cycles of ABP waveforms and 33,792 cardiac cycles of PPG waveforms. Additionally, to assess the tool's real-time landmark detection capability, we retrospectively analyzed 3,000 cardiac cycles of both ABP and PPG waveforms, collected from a Philips IntelliVue MX800 patient monitor. The tool's detection performance was assessed against markings by an experienced researcher, achieving average F1-scores and error rates for ABP and PPG as follows: (1) On MLORD dataset: systolic phase onset (99.77 %, 0.35 % and 99.52 %, 0.75 %), systolic phase peak (99.80 %, 0.30 % and 99.56 %, 0.70 %), dicrotic notch (98.24 %, 2.63 % and 98.72 %, 1.96 %), and diastolic phase peak (98.59 %, 2.11 % and 98.88 %, 1.73 %); (2) On real time data: systolic phase onset (98.18 %, 3.03 % and 97.94 %, 3.43 %), systolic phase peak (98.22 %, 2.97 % and 97.74 %, 3.77 %), dicrotic notch (97.72 %, 3.80 % and 98.16 %, 3.07 %), and diastolic phase peak (98.04 %, 3.27 % and 98.08 %, 3.20 %). This tool has significant potential for supporting clinical utilization of ABP and PPG waveform features and for facilitating feature-based machine learning models for various clinical applications where features derived from these waveforms play a critical role.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.