SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2025
The effects of exercise interventions on depressive symptoms in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nonlinear dose-response effects of exercise interventions on post-stroke depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of different types of exercise therapy in improving post-stroke depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of exercise interventions on sleep quality in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- High-intensity interval training after stroke: evidence & practice.Physical activity and nutrition · 2026Article
- Effects of exercise based on ACSM recommendations on individuals with a prediabetic state: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on depressive symptoms in stroke patients. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, We conducted searches in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. The topic was the effect of exercise on depression levels in stroke patients. Patient's performance on depression scales after exercise was assessed using standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A random effects model (RE) was used to conduct a meta-analysis and compare the results between subgroups conducted based on adherence to ACSM guidelines and the length of exercise interventions. Results: The analysis included 24 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,757 participants. The meta-analysis revealed that exercise interventions had a significant positive effect on reducing depressive symptoms in stroke patients, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.43 (95% CI: 0.65, -0.21). Subgroup analysis indicated that high compliance with ACSM guidelines resulted in a more substantial reduction in depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.79, 95% CI: 1.10, -0.49), compared with low or uncertain compliance (SMD = -0.03, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.10). Longer exercise intervention was associated with greater mitigation of depressive symptoms. The differences between intervention groups of different lengths were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These findings support the integration of tailored exercise programs into post-stroke care to optimize mental health outcomes. Compliance to ACSM-recommended exercise dosages significantly ameliorate depression levels in stroke patients. Further research is warranted to explore standardized exercise regimens in larger, multicenter trials. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier PROSPERO(CRD42024579095).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.