Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166718›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2025

Impact of low-load blood flow restriction training on knee osteoarthritis pain and muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Qiuxiang Lin, Debiao Yu, Yuping Zhang, Xiaoting Chen, Jiawei Qin, Fuchun Wu

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiuxiang LinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Debiao YuProvincial Clinical Medicine College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yuping ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Xiaoting ChenCollege of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Jiawei Qin *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Fuchun Wu *Provincial Clinical Medicine College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The effectiveness of low-load blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRT) in alleviating symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess the effects of LL-BFRT compared to conventional resistance training on pain, muscle strength, and functional capacity in individuals with KOA. Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, Scopus, and Cochrane trails were searched. Study selection: We included randomized controlled trials involving patients with KOA, in which the intervention group underwent LL-BFRT. Data extraction: Literature quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool (ROB 2). Data were extracted using a predefined table, including outcomes such as pain, quadriceps muscle strength, 30-s sit-to-stand test (30STS) and Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Result: Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that, compared to conventional resistance training, LL-BFRT significantly improved knee joint pain [SMD = 0.25, 95%CI (0.02, 0.48), P = 0.03], increased quadriceps muscle strength [SMD = 0.46, 95%CI (0.04, 0.88), P = 0.03], and enhanced performance on the 30s sit-to-stand test (30STS) [WMD = 1.71, 95%CI (0.30, 3.11), P = 0.02]. However, no significant difference was observed in the improvement of the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) [WMD = -0.13, 95%CI (-0.51, 0.24), P = 0.49]. Subgroup analysis revealed that interventions with an occlusion pressure >100 mmHg and a duration ≤6 weeks had a significant impact on pain relief, quadriceps muscle strength, and the 30STS performance. For patients with KOA aged >65 years, LL-BFRT was more effective in alleviating pain, while for patients aged ≤65 years, it demonstrated more significant improvements in quadriceps strength and 30STS performance. Conclusion: Limited evidence suggests that LL-BFRT may be more effective than conventional resistance training in improving pain, quadriceps muscle strength, and 30STS performance in patients with KOA, while exhibiting a comparable effect on TUG test. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42024603542.

Indexed as

blood flow restriction trainingknee osteoarthritispainphysical functionrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40166718
PMCPMC11955650

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.