ArticleArXiv2025
ISIT-GEN: An in silico imaging trial to assess the inter-scanner generalizability of CTLESS for myocardial perfusion SPECT on defect-detection task.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recently proposed scatter-window and deep learning-based attenuation compensation (AC) method for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), namely CTLESS, demonstrated promising performance on the clinical task of myocardial perfusion defect detection with retrospective data acquired on SPECT scanners from a single vendor. For clinical translation of CTLESS, it is important to assess the generalizability of CTLESS across different SPECT scanners. For this purpose, we conducted a virtual imaging trial, titled in silico imaging trial to assess generalizability (ISIT-GEN). ISIT-GEN assessed the generalizability of CTLESS on the cardiac perfusion defect detection task across SPECT scanners from three different vendors. The performance of CTLESS was compared with a standard-of-care CT-based AC (CTAC) method and a no-attenuation compensation (NAC) method using an anthropomorphic model observer. We observed that CTLESS had receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves similar to those of CTAC. Further, CTLESS was observed to significantly outperform the NAC method across three scanners. These results are suggestive of the inter-scanner generalizability of CTLESS and motivate further clinical evaluations. The study also highlights the value of using in silico imaging trials to assess the generalizability of deep learning-based AC methods feasibly and rigorously.
Identifiers
40166744PMC11957238What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.